A Hollywood Republican

This blog is for an open discussion on politics. My views will be to the right as will be most of the posters. But, we are willing to post alternative viewpoints as lons as they are well thought out. I started this in response to the Obama election and will continue it as long as it feeds a need.

Feb 5, 2010

"Broken" Health Care by Craig Covello

I work as a project manager for the IT component of a large healthcare organization. Usually the work feels rewarding, especially when you can see the tangible results of the project team's efforts. But on days like today, it is especially satisfying. I made a difference in the life of a 17-year-old cancer patient. Let me explain.

For a long, long time, our organization has been trying to implement wireless LAN guest access for use by patients and their families on laptop computers and smart-phones. No big deal, right? Well maybe not for Starbucks, but in a hospital setting we have to be very careful with frequencies and bandwidth utilization so that clinical information systems are not degraded, or worse attacked, as a result of Internet surfing by the public. We finally arrived at a solution. At 9:00 PST last night, we flipped the switch. Wireless guest access is now available on the entire hospital campus.

The truth is we were not planning on flipping the switch quite this soon. There's additional work to be done regarding generation of public relations announcements, but we decided to activate the system early because of a special circumstance. It seems that there was a young man who was admitted three months ago and is still undergoing chemotherapy. To make matters worse, this kid won't be going home for at least another three months. In the meantime, he's staring at the four walls of an isolated sterile room. Sure, there's the occasional mind numbing diversion of "reality" television, but how much of that can even healthy person take? (I don't think anyone's writing television scripts anymore, right Frank?) Our organization's hospital administrator was sensitive to this situation, so she gave me a call inquiring if there was any way we could expedite campus-wide access to the Internet, specifically for the benefit of this particular patient. What could I say? The answer, of course, was yes. We made this a priority. It was available as of this morning. In fact, I had the privilege of delivering a laptop to this teenager. Both he and his mother were very grateful. Can you imagine a 17-year-old diagnosed with cancer and stuck in a hospital room without being able to communicate with his friends via e-mail or Facebook for the past 3 months?

What does any of this have to do with politics?

Well, it occurred to me walking out of the hospital that there has been a lot of negative press regarding American healthcare lately. Even Obama himself said "Our health-care system is broken: expensive, inefficient, and poorly adapted...” Nancy Pelosi was also quoted as saying - ““You go through the gate. If the gate's closed, you go over the fence. If the fence is too high, we'll poll vault in. If that doesn't work, we'll parachute in. But we're going to get health care passed for the American people.” She speaks as if to imply that there is no health care for the American people at all. Time for a reality check. There is no national "crisis", and now it looks like Obama has put health-care reform on the back burner. If it was truly a national crisis, why would he give it such a casual mention 30 minutes into the State of the Union address? More on that later.

Obama used the term "broken". The definition of "broken" means that something is not working. That's not the case here. We certainly have issues regarding escalating healthcare costs which need to be addressed, but not by having the federal government take over under the guise of reducing costs. Far too many examples have been cited illustrating how the federal government's control of anything actually increases costs. To say otherwise is disingenuous. And it also implies that escalating costs are caused by a greedy free market. Politicians have vilified insurance companies over this issue, but have you heard much commentary regarding the improvement in care over the past 15 years? Has this health care debate said anything about the cost of research, which roughly doubled 1994 between 2003? Miracles cost money. How much is a life worth? These are tough questions. It is easier to target an industry and attack it than being honest about where the money is being spent.

There have also been a lot of alarming statistics thrown around regarding the number of uninsured Americans. The White House believes this number is about 45 million people, or 15% of the population. Other studies suggest it's closer to 3% when you consider those who choose not to have insurance or those who are between jobs. I don't know which statistic is closer to the truth, but based upon my experience listening to this administration, it's probably closer to 3% than 15%. Yes, the unemployment rate is currently 9.7% and certainly much higher if we consider people who have stopped looking for jobs and are no longer counted. But the number of individuals sans healthcare does not necessarily mirror the number of unemployed, since health insurance plans typically cover households. These households may have spouses who provide family coverage. No matter. Even if we use the most liberal number of 15%, it still means that 85% of Americans have health insurance and they want to keep it in place.

And if our system is so "inefficient", why do we offer some of the best care in the world? Case in point: the 60-year-old Canadian premier Danny Williams recently came to the United States for heart surgery to correct a rare aneurysm. Canadian officials believe that there is an adequate cardio care in places like Ontario, but they also admit that no one in their entire country has much experience with treating William's rare condition. He's in good company with other Canadian officials who have sought US healthcare as lifesaving alternative to Canada's nationalized health system. This list includes Quebec’s Robert Bourassa in 1990 and Parliament's Belinda Stronach in 2007. These examples are purely anecdotal, but they are telling.

My personal opinion? Healthcare is not "broken". Healthcare is in the cross-hairs of the government because that's where a lot of money is these days. If the White House numbers are correct, forcing 45 million people into federally mandated, administered and under-funded healthcare programs will not reduce costs, but it sure is a good way to skim a percentage off the top for government coffers. This concept will also introduce layers of additional bureaucracy which will do nothing but complicate this situation, put additional barriers between the doctor-patient relationship, limit choices and reduce the overall quality of care. That's a strong statement, but stop and reflect for a moment the possibility of politicians in Washington making health care decisions for you. Oh, by the way, it was proposed that Congress be exempt from the plan and that Unions be exempt from certain types of health care taxation. Also telling.

Some may think that this article touches on a stale topic. After all, Obamacare is dead, right? Wrong. It failed publicly, so be prepared for stealth mode. Rename it, break it into smaller pieces and repackage it. Delay the schedule. Work behind the scenes to get federal control over the healthcare system. Remember what the queen of the Air force taxi service said: "we'll poll vault in. If that doesn't work, we'll parachute in. But we're going to get (nationalized) health care passed for the American people.”

Let's say Nancy gets her way. Fast forward 10 years and I wonder how the situation with our 17-year-old cancer patient would be if Obamacare was implemented. Would he have a private room as he does today? Would he have a hospital administrator advocating on his behalf in order to lift his spirits with free Internet access? Would his family be able to afford an insurance policy that would pay for a hospital stay in excess of six months? Would he receive the best care, as judged by his physician? Or would he simply be told by a federal employee to go home after two weeks with a med dispenser because of the new, "efficient, government healthcare?

The health care system is not broken. Ask the teenager.

© 2010 by Craig Covello. Used with permission. All rights reserved.

Labels: , ,

9 Comments:

Blogger CS said...

As an employee of the fed government I find you classification of the way they run healthcare inaccurate to say the least (or a outright lie but I'll be nice) . During Katrina who are the only people to have med records available ? The vets at the dept of vet affairs that's who (Electronically) so before casting disparaging comments on government run healthcare please know what and who you are talking about.
Also having myself spent upwards of 4 months in hospital I'll tell you this the private system is indeed broken. Had I not been a fed employee ,Union mind you,I would be dead . (with absolutely NO thanks to the ins co,they(are thieves) f..... up every piece of paperwork turned in ) I only wish i myself could have spent it in a V.A. hospital
So forgive me for laughing

February 5, 2010 at 8:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Craig,

I thought you were arrogant from your last posts, but this one confirms it.

First, please don't equate efficiency with quality of care. We have the world's best healthcare delivery system...that is the best docs and technology....Our payment system is BROKEN!!!!

Efficiency means the percentage of output for a given input. In our case, we get less out (as measured in delivered health care) then we put in (as measured in $$$) due to excessive overhead by insurance companies,hospitals, and doctor's. Its this inefficiency that people cite when they say the system is broken. And its this inefficiency that reform aims to improve.

So, perhaps you should learn the meaning of the words you use before you use them.

Miracles cost money....yep they do!!!!! So does marketing!!!!!! My cynical side says that the marketing costs are being recovered by drug costs. Just how many cialis ads do we need to see every day? That was a rhetorical question.

Next, I find it galling that you dismiss a 15% rate of uninsured as nothing to fret about. Amazing!!!!

Lastly, let's fast forward ten years assuming the status quo....would his family be able to afford any healthcare????? I doubt it.

Every hospital I've EVER BEEN IN has wireless internet access. So, stop patting yourself on the back, and repeating your company's talking points about how all is well in the world!!!

OMG....I was doing these kind of IT projects 10 years ago....old hat!!!!!

February 6, 2010 at 2:53 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

As a development officer, for a medium sized not for profit health system and cancer center in south florida, I fall somewhere in the middle of the writer's opinion and your response, George. Yes, you are correct, the writer is mixing metaphors -- healthcare delivery and the quality of the technology medical care/services available to our patients today with health care costs. However, so often in a medical setting the two go hand in glove. Every day, we are solicited by our physicians and administrators to "find funding" to provide more surgical suites, cover the costs of cancer drugs and expand our community-based programs and services (including providing open internet that you so causally consider pervasive). Unfortunately, the quality health care that most Americans have grown accustomed to and expect and deserve, costs a lot of money. Money that is in no way recovered by the current health insurance system. Did you know that almost 1/3 of the people in my AFFLUENT community are considered indigent because they rely on Medicare funding. Did you also know that most of our seasonal population, wealthy Northeasterns who have private jets and personal concierge physicians at home, utilize our Emergency Room as a primary care physician? This year alone, my hospital must raise more then $20 million dollars to fund projects that will provide basic health care for an aging and demanding population. This $20 million dollars will not come from federal funding or the pharma companies (no matter how many Cialis ads they run, sorry). This funding will come from the generosity of the American people who believe that health care is a "civil right," not a multi-billion dollar industry. Health care is indeed broken...we just haven't found the right tools to fix it.

February 6, 2010 at 3:15 AM  
Anonymous Ira said...

You know what, our present health care system is not broken all it needs is a tune up. The government has proved again and again that they can not run major programs efficiently. The Vetrens Administration, the Post office, Nasa for just a few. My close friend is a vet. Served 5 tours of duty in Vietnam, wounded six times and has a chest full of medals including the silver star. A year ago he hurt his knee, could barely walk it was so swollen. I took him to the VA hospital in Westwood Ca. Waited 4 hours to see a doctor, who looked at it an said, "Yep. It's swollen alright." Then he told him he would need n MRI and proceeded to make an appointment for him in SIX MONTHS. And don't tell me that an isolated case. I've seen it happen a dozen times over the years. I've read articles about the lousy care and seen news stories about the horrible conditions in numerous hospitals. Yes our health care needs to be reformed but the last thing we need is the government meddling in it. The track record is less than steller.

February 6, 2010 at 9:17 AM  
Anonymous Billy Dean said...

I totally agree Ira!!! I don't really understand how anyone can think the Federal government could run something as personal as health care. If you think Insurance companies are bad, try dealing with a full fledged government agency and find out what the word "impersonal" really means. Isn't there thousands of different insurance companies all working for your business? There will only be one government run plan.
Sometimes I feel like we are talking about weather its night or day! If I hear the word choice in this crazy health care debate one more time I'll scream!!! As far as I know, if you deal with the government agency you have NO choice. Taxes, License, Fees, Fines, Unemployment, and all the other little things that the government does for us or to us, if you don't get the paper work right you do it again till you get it right or you don't get what ever it is you want!!
I wish we could all agree about one fact, we don't want the federal government involved in our health care!!!!!

February 6, 2010 at 11:04 AM  
Anonymous Ira said...

Well Billy if they didn't get it last month in Massachusetts they will get in November when we send the bunch of them packing. One way or another we will get our point across.

February 6, 2010 at 11:12 AM  
Blogger Frank T. DeMartini said...

I agree that the VA system is a mess. I have a very close friend who is a Vietnam Vet. He is also a Paranoid Schizophrenic with a lost leg from the war. If it weren't for his brother who is his conservator to force the VA to act and to treat him, my friend would be in a permanent lock up. It is only the constant threats of law suits and the constant phone calls that get anything done.
My background is as a lawyer and I have had to go to the VA medical center a few times when my friend needed treatment for some ailment. When the lawyer shows up, they do something. Other than that, they are typical bureaucrats that collect their paycheck, get their great benefits and six weeks vacation. They could care less about the vets they are supposed to be helping.
It's similar with the Post Office and any other government bureaucracy I've ever experience. The Post Office loses money. FEDEX and UPS make money.
Similar pattern in everything.
Keep the FEDS and any government out of my life.

February 6, 2010 at 4:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

OK Guys, lets talk turkey....Tell me how to tune it up? Convince me that left to their own devices, our insurance companies can lower administrative costs and provide lower premiums AND provide universal access???????

And please....stop acting like the VA are uncaring without at least stating that our insurance industry is at least as uncaring!!!!!

You know where I stand...access to high quality healthcare should be a given in this country, independent of means. Some of you think differently, and that's okay. But please stop bashing and offer solutions.

Craig's article did a lot of bashing, and no solving!!!!

February 6, 2010 at 5:16 PM  
Anonymous Ira said...

Simple regulation. That is what our government does best isn't it. The insurance companies need guidelines to operate under, such as no pre existing conditions, low cost, affordable to all HMO coverage, Tort reform and an insurance exchange where all insurance companies that want to do business in the US can register and display all their plans in open competition with the rest. One-stop shopping. This would save the governemnt and us tax payers billions if not trillions less then any of the plans, republican and democrat, presently being proposed. In a perfect world high quality heathcare for all would be something to strive for in reality with the worlds present economic conditions it's unfeasible and not a reality. Low cost HMO's are doable and that is where we need to go. Would you give away your services for free on a regular basis? That's your livelyhood, it puts food on your families table. I wouldn't. Why would you expect doctors too.

February 7, 2010 at 7:52 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home